DECLARATION regarding the Draft bill for the amending of the Constitution of Romania carried out by the Commission for the revision of the Constitution within the Romania’s Parliament, draft which was published in the Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 100, of Feb 10th, 2014 (writing revised and enlarged based on comments and suggestions we received)

CONSTITUTIONAL GROUP ”Timisoara”
Headquarters: 2Salciei street, stairs C, apt.2, Timisoara
E-mail: forum.constitutional.timisoara@gmail.com
Web-Site: www.lorin-fortuna.ro
Phone: 0256/446595
No: 1/18.02.2014
DECLARATION
regarding
the Draft bill for the amending of the Constitution of Romania carried out by the
Commission for the revision of the Constitution within the Romania’s Parliament,
draft which was published in the Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 100, of Feb
10th, 2014
(writing revised and enlarged based on comments and suggestions we received)
For the information of the:
 United Nations Organization
 Leaderships of the International Religions
 European Parliament
 European Commission
 Venice Commission for Constitutional Affairs
 Romanian Parliament ( Senate; Chamber of Deputies)
 President of Romania
 Constitutional Court of Romania
 Government of Romania
 Supreme Council of Magistracy
 Romanian Academy
 Legislative Council of the Romanian Parliament
 Parliamentary Commission for the revision of the Constitution
 Faculties of Law in Romania
 Faculties of theology, Ecclesiastical seminaries and Schools of theology in
Romania
 State Secretariat for the revolutionaries’ matters
 Institute of the Romanian Revolution of December 1989
 Associations of Participants to the Romanian Revolution of December 1989
 Home and International Mass-Media
 Any other concerned institutions
 Any other concerned persons
After a principial, general analysis of the Draft bill for the amending of the current
Constitution of Romania carried out by the Parliamentary Commission for the
revision of the Constitution, the Constitutional Group “Timisoara” consider as being
their civic and patriotic duty to transmit, publicly, the following assessments on the draft bill
in question:
1
1. A Constitution cannot have a full legislative power of Supreme Law in a State and
remains, in the main, just an Official Declaration of constitutional intents, as we
think it is, in fact, the current state Constitution of Romania (and as it will still remain
after the modification proposed to be done as well, through the legislating of the
Draft bill for the constitutional amending, mentioned before, in case the
modification in question will be carried out) in the absence of a Justice System, of
constitutional level, associated with the Constitution in question ( System
which should include a Court of constitutional level, a Code of specific
constitutional offences and a Code of legal proceedings, specific to the
justice of constitutional level).
2. In accordance with the provisions of the current Constitution of Romania,
referring to the Revision of the Constitution (Title VII) which includes also
provisions relating to the limits of the revision of the Constitution (article 152),
within a State of Law, sovereign and democratic, as Romania is declared to be
at the constitutional level (in Article 1, paragraphs 1- 3), between the revision
and the amending of the Constitution there is a significant difference, pointed
out at constitutional level inclusively ( in article 152) in the sense that the
initiative of revising the Constitution can be assumed by certain institutions,
respectively by certain population groups, authorized for this purpose, within
the current Constitution (see Articles:150; 151; 152, of Title VII: Revision of the
Constitution ), while the amending of the Constitution (which implies, among
others, the ignoring or even the changing of the constitutional provisions of
Title VII, mentioned above), cannot be initiated but under special conditions,
approved beforehand by the exclusive holder of the Supreme Power in the
State ( power called: National Sovereignty ), that is the Romanian People, as
well as only in the terms of fulfilling some constitutional provisions,
stipulated to this end in the current Constitution of Romania, namely : “No
group or person may exercise sovereignty in one’s own name” (article 2,
paragraphs 1; 2).
3. Thus, in order to achieve the amending (and not just the revision only) of the
Constitution of Romania we do consider that a Parliament is needed,
specially elected for this purpose, that the exclusive holder of the national
Sovereignty, the Romanian People (in accordance with the provisions of the
article 2, paragraphs 1; 2) have to invest, by referendum (organized beforehand
to this end) if they want the amending and not only the revision of the
Constitution.
If the amending of the Constitution is required, it is the Romanian People that
should decide, beforehand, in full awareness of the fundamental, respectively
of the principal options (depending on the case) which they want to be
introduced or amended (by adequate constitutional provisions) in the current
Constitution of Romania.
4. Also, in case the Romanian People choose to amend the state Constitution,
after carrying out the referendum (before mentioned), the competent
institutions should schedule, before starting the amending of the
Constitution, parliamentary elections, with the official motivation that, the new
elected Parliament is going to have also the role of “Constituent Assembly”
or of ”Constitution modificatory Parliament” (depending on the case) in which
the priority in electing the MPs should be officially recommended to be
2
oriented towards the properly trained candidates in the Science of Law, in
general, and in the Science of the Constitutional Law, in particular, namely as it
was decided by the referendum mentioned before, and not an Ordinary
Parliament (constitutionally authorized just for the revision of the
Constitution only).
So it was done in the year 1990, after the carrying out of the Romanian Revolution
of December 1989 (RRD-1989), case which thus represents a constitutional
precedent, having the juridical value of constitutional jurisprudence, which we
appreciate it should be taken into account, as such, inclusively in the constitutional
context previously mentioned.
5. Likewise, in the same constitutional context, previously mentioned, we would like to
point out that the Draft bill for the amending of the Constitution of Romania
(mentioned above), in the form as well as under the auspices in which it was
achieved and published officially (in the Official Gazette of Romania, Part I,
no.100/10.02.2014), represents a particularly serious constitutional abuse
which we claim publicly, with the purpose of the official informing and also
self-informing of the national and international competent institutions in order
to intercede for the defense of the Romanian State as a national, sovereign
and independent, unitary and indivisible, republican, governed by the rule of
law, democratic and social State, as it is declared at the constitutional level in the
current Constitution of Romania (in article 1, paragraphs 1; 2; 3), provisions which
are guaranteed as well, at the constitutional level (in article 1, paragraph 3), and
also as a laical State, as it has been and as we do consider it should remain, in
fact, even if it was not stipulated to be so, by law too, at the constitutional level.
6. In the same context, mentioned above, we appreciate that it should not be
notified only but also warned and claimed officially and publicly, especially the
fact that the officializing by publishing even in the Official Gazette of Romania
(mentioned above) of the Draft bill for the amending of the Constitution of
Romania (mentioned above) is actually an extremely grave attempt of coup
d’etat of constitutional type, carried out in terms of previously committing
numerous as well as particularly serious constitutional, legislative and
institutional abuses, with the remark that, many of these abuses can be
equivalent, judicially, to the specific constitutional offences of: usurpation of
Sovereignty, respectively of high treason, committed against the current State
of Romania, resulted in consequence of the Romanian Revolution of
December 1989, fact stated inclusively as conceptual model (in Article 1,
paragraph 3, of the current Constitution of Romania), but removed from the Draft
bill for the constitutional amending (mentioned before).
We point out and even claim that, at present, for sure not accidentally, within the
current Constitution of Romania the offence of high treason is the only
infringement of the law of constitutional type, stipulated as such, but referring
only to the President of Romania, as a possible perpetrator, as if the high
treason might not have been committed by other leaders as well.
7. We do consider that in case the institutions responsible for the defense of the
Romanian State, respectively for the preserving of the constitutional order,
stipulated to exist (in accordance with the provisions of the current Constitution of
Romania), would not take action, firmly and efficiently, in order to defend the
State of Romania given the existence of the state danger (mentioned and
3
claimed before), both the institutions in question and, especially, the leaders of
these institutions can and must be considered as being, in fact, usurpers of
National Sovereignty, or accomplices to the respective offence (depending on
the case), with the mention that the offence in question is not stipulated in the
current Constitution of Romania but it is stipulated (and perhaps not
accidentally), in the Draft bill for the amending of the Constitution of Romania
(mentioned above), being included (probably not by chance) even in the
category of the extremely serious offences of constitutional type, called
constitutional crimes, within the respective Draft bill for the constitutional
amending.
In the light of the above, we also appreciate that the initiators and the makers of
the Draft bill for the amending of the Constitution of Romania (mentioned and
claimed previously) as well as their accomplices should be considered as
being evil-doers too, both by law and in fact, at the state level, against whom
preventive actions should be taken, urgently and officially, actions of
intimation and self-notification as well as of investigation, indictment,
arraignment, trial, conviction and punishment ( depending on the case), with the
death penalty inclusively, penalty about which we appreciate that it should be
reinstated urgently in the Romanian justice by the competent courts, after the
arbitrary removal of this punishment from the Penal Code (certainly not by chance)
on 07.01.1990, by Ion Iliescu, in a short time after the killing of the Ceausescu
couple, as an effect of a criminal trial which took place on 25.12.1989, that was in
fact a justice farce (claimed, as such, at the international level too).
8. We also appreciate that a juridical treatment, similar to the one previously
required, should be applied, preventively, both at present and in the future,
inclusively against all those who commit constitutional abuses and especially
anti-state attempts, with a view to diminishing the state danger represented
by the organizing and triggering of such actions.
As examples of very serious constitutional abuses, in light of the above, we signal
out the extremely dangerous anomaly, through its effects at the societal level,
existing even in the current Constitution of Romania, by which it is stipulated that:
the Government of Romania is responsible for its entire activity only
politically and only before Parliament (which, thus, is turned abusively, into a
political juridical instance, in the context in which, in Romania, does not exist a
Justice System of political type, adequately authorized and regulated, but
only one of juridical type).
The anomaly highlighted before (stipulated by article 109, paragraph 1, of the
current Constitution of Romania) not only that it was not remedied within the
revisions to which was subjected the Constitution of Romania, worked out
after the carrying out of the Romanian Revolution of December 1989 , but it is
not remedied in the Draft bill for the constitutional amending either (mentioned
before), being still maintained with an amendment by which the Parliament,
invested as a “political-instance”(!) was substituted for the President of the
State (probably for the purpose of facilitating the justice manipulation, of
political type, in question).
In the same context we do signal out also as particularly serious abuses
within the Draft bill for the constitutional amending (mentioned before) the
“officializing” of the subversive monarchist propaganda ( carried out at
present too, through the National Television Company inclusively, on the show “
4
King’s hour ”) which is emphasized within the Draft bill for the constitutional
amending (mentioned before) by the deliberate and constitutionally-abusive
ignorance of the ban to revise constitutionally the type of
“Republican State” (as it is stipulated to be Romania, in article 152, titled: ”Limits
of revision“, in the current Constitution of Romania) and by introducing even in
the Article 1 of the Draft bill for the constitutional amending (mentioned
before) the possibility to change the type of State by national referendum,
having in view obviously just the possibility of turning the Republican State (
set up by the carrying out of the Romanian Revolution of December 1989) into a
Monarchic State, probably on the occasion of a future constitutional revision,
being known the preference of the current President of the Parliament of
Romania: G.C.L. Antonescu for the restoration of monarchy in Romania, as
well as his “chronic” indisposition showed repeatedly and publicly towards
the Republican State (to which we consider that have to be associated the
monarchist “low bows“ and the imperialist “genuflections “ of the Prime-
Minister (respectively: Prime-sinister V.V.Ponta as he is called in Timisoara by
those citizens set free from communist dictatorship by the carrying out of the
Romanian Revolution of December 1989, started in Timisoara on 20.12.1989,
but worried, at present, about the prospect of being turned into “monarchic
subjects”, if, in Romania, the retrograde couple: G.C.L.Antonescu –V.V.Ponta
will be left to ”tarry” too long to exercise the Supreme Power in the State by
usurpation of national Sovereignty.
Another very serious anomaly which we want to signal out as well as to highlight
is the elimination from the Draft bill for the constitutional amending
(mentioned before) of the type of “Social State” (by not mentioning this type
of State within the Article 1 of the respective Draft bill for the constitutional
amending) as well as, in addition, the removal, from the same Draft bill, of the
existing Article 47, of the current Constitution of Romania, referring to the
compulsoriness to ensure a decent living standard for its citizens, probably
because it undermines unacceptably, from the point of view of the present
governing coalition (U.S.L.), “the financial basis of budgetary dilapidation” by
exercising an adequate state governing, namely, heavily corrupted, at political
party clientage level.
We left at the end the example of another constitutional abuse of : “ usurpation of
national Sovereignty “ type which the Commission for the revision of the
Constitution, within the Parliament of Romania, abusively turned “ad-hoc” into the
Commission for the amending of the Constitution, took the liberty of committing
within the framework of the aforementioned Draft bill, ignoring, with nonchalance,
the resolution adopted by the majority of the electorate of Romania at the
referendum which took place on 22nd of November 2009, regarding the
transformation of the bicameral Parliament of Romania into a unicameral
Parliament with maximum 300 MPs (referendum which was labeled later on by
the U.S.L. couple G.C.L.Antonescu-V.V.Ponta, publicly and disdainfully towards the
Electorate that attended the referendum, as being just a consultative referendum,
but not a sovereign one too, after the current Parliament previously refused to
apply it.
We cannot wind up the list of eloquent examples of constitutional abuses, included
in the aforementioned Draft bill, without calling, publicly, the attention to the serious
danger, which only few initiated persons in Esotericism know, of transforming
5
a laical State into a religious State, by law, (as is the Iranian State, for example),
or just into a religious State, in fact, as we appreciate Romania will get, if the
Draft bill for the constitutional amending in question will be legislated and
enforced at the constitutional level.
We thus signal out publicly (even against the religious Christian-Orthodox current,
which has been manifesting at present in Romania) the fact that the Christian-
Orthodox religion (prevailing as religious practice in Romania), not only that it
should not be supported, substantially, by the State (as it happens at present)
but it must be forbidden by law, because it is the most subversive and
noxious religion of all that are practiced, at international level, at present, in
the World.
Unfortunately, this religion is still practiced massively in Romania, although it is the
only religion which, by a specifically religious ritual practice, cripples
existentially and even annihilates, from the specific civilizational point of
view, the superior individual beings (persons) turning them from “free
people” into “slaves of Christ - our God”.
This existential degradation performed through the baptizing ritual, at an
infantile age, when children cannot defend by themselves (not being fully
aware) is continued within the next ritual by the marriage in the same capacity
as “slaves” after which it follows at their worldly end the burial ritual (as a
corpse of an ex-“slave”), ritual to which it is associated the specific begging
prayer: “God, have mercy !”, instead of the dignified prayer: “God help !”.
It should be known and realized adequately that Romania too has come to be
enslaved, in an occult and subversive way, as a State, to the greatest extent,
especially due to the fact that it has a state population made up, in large
majority, not of existentially-free people but of “slaves of Christ - our God“
and the baptizing as an existential-“slave” has a catastrophic effect in the
existential evolution of a being, baptized in this way, and this is in fact a grave
esoteric aggression, of religious type, of which the being in question cannot,
as a rule, get free but by existential exorcizing performed by esoteric
combatants, sufficiently strong, but in environmental and existential
conditions which are not very hostile to the optimum carrying out of such an
action.
In order to exemplify this aspect, we would have you know that a characteristic
feature of the Christian-Orthodox girls, who practice the respective religion, is
the fact that often it is instilled into them, mentally, the conception that their
supreme aspiration, at spiritual level, should be that of becoming “brides of
the bridegroom Christ” and for this purpose, in order to purify themselves,
they should enter a nunnery and become nuns, thus secluding themselves, at
the existential level.
9. In a not only possible but also probable case that the competent institutions
and their leaders ( to whom we are addressing publicly by this Declaration) would
not take action, concretely, firmly and correctly, for the defense and
observance of the constitutional order, so as we appreciate, too, with regret
and indignation, that some of these institutions proceeded already, we would
have you know that we would consider ourselves entitled to address directly
and publicly to the state Population as it was done in December 1989 as well,
for the purpose of raising the awareness and involving, directly and firmly, the
6
Romanian People so that by the means they have to act efficiently in order to
restore the state constitutional order in Romania and to retrieve (through a
new revolution inclusively, if need be) the national Sovereignty from those
degraded institutions as well as from those abusive leaders, usurpers of the
national Sovereignty and even high- traitors who acted, occultly and
subversively and also extremely destructive, at the societal level, in order to
confiscate the national Sovereignty from its rightful and sole owner: the
Romanian People, with a view to using it, in a constitutionally-abusive way, to
their own interest or to the interest of a clientele group.
10. We would also have you know that, at the end of this Declaration, that in the
particularly grave situation in which we appreciate the State of Romania is
now, as a result of triggering the anti-constitutional plot (mentioned before) we
also intend, to the full extent and provided we would not be subjected to
pressures and/or even oppressions by some state institutions degraded into
occult and subversive agencies ( to which we have been subjected, consistently,
especially in Timisoara, for about 2 years, pressures meant to prevent us from
carrying on, publicly, our civic and patriotic duty, which we assumed), to further
work out and spread other more detailed civic-analyses of the Draft bill for the
amending of the Constitution of Romania (mentioned before) just to signal out
and exemplify better the subversion as well as the state and societal danger
represented by the legislating and implementation, at the constitutional level,
of the respective Draft bill.
Leader
of the Constitutional Group “Timisoara”
Lorin Fortuna
P.S. 1
We make an appeal to all those who appreciate the civic activity of the
Constitutional Group “Timisoara” to support, as far as possible, the spreading of
the present Declaration, both within the State of Romania and in the EU member
countries and to the governing bodies of the European Union, as well as to other
countries in the World.
P.S. 2
We call the attention of all those interested in and concerned with taking our country
out of the extremely grave situation in which it is now due to the post-revolutionary,
political-party wrong-doers, to the fact that on 03.03.2014, at the Supreme Court of
Cassation and Justice is going to take place a decisive phase of the law suit in
which the defendant, as a plagiarist, is the Prime-sinister V.V. Ponta. We deem it a
very favorable opportunity to bring our contribution, by adequate civic methods, to
the dismissal of the “sinister” who put us to shame in Europe and in the World, by
humbly accepting the Brussels Dictate as well as in his capacity as a plagiarist,
attested as such, by institutions and personalities (morally and professionally
competent), autochthonous and from abroad.
What is your opinion about this issue ?. If the Ukrainians succeeded in, why
shouldn’t we too have a try ?.
7
8